Which analogy relates a structure to language or literature?

The linguistic analogy is the most appropriate choice for relating a structure to language or literature. This analogy highlights how both language and architecture have underlying systems and rules that govern their formation and interpretation. Just as syntax, grammar, and semantics shape language, the principles of design, structural integrity, and aesthetic coherence shape architecture.

In this context, structures can be seen as a kind of language themselves, conveying ideas, emotions, and cultural narratives much like a text does. This connection emphasizes the significance of communication in both fields, where the elements of architecture serve a similar purpose to words in forming meanings.

While the other analogies—conceptual, metaphorical, and visual—might draw connections between different ideas or sensory experiences, they do not specifically focus on the parallels of structure with the systems of language or literature. The linguistic analogy distinctly captures that essence, illustrating how both disciplines express complex thoughts and emotions through their unique but analogous frameworks.