Which path-space relationship maintains the integrity of each space while allowing flexible configuration of the path?

The concept of "pass-by spaces" refers to arrangements in architectural design where a pathway allows for movement alongside or adjacent to different spaces without direct interception. This arrangement maintains the integrity of each distinct space, as individuals can navigate through the environment without having to enter or disrupt the spaces adjacent to the path.

In this context, the pathway remains flexible in its configuration, accommodating various movement patterns while still respecting the boundaries and functional purposes of the spaces it passes. This is particularly important in urban design and architectural layouts where the flow of movement needs to be efficient but should not compromise the entries or experiences of individual spaces.

On the other hand, the other options focus on relationships that may not uphold the same balance between movement and spatial integrity. "Pass-through spaces" would imply that the path directly interacts with or intersects the spaces, potentially compromising their privacy or usage. "Terminate in a space" suggests that the pathway concludes within a space, which may limit the design's flexibility. "Proportion" relates more to the scale and dimensions of spaces rather than the functional relationship between paths and spaces.

Thus, pass-by spaces effectively create a system where movement can be designed fluidly, ensuring that each space is respected and retains its singular identity while allowing for adaptable pathways.